(unknown)
[email protected] Thu, 27 May 2004 09:55:05 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.snmpv3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4QKt1c20206 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 26 May 2004 16:55:01 -0400 (EDT) csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAO_aqbC; Wed, 26 May 04 16:54:03 -0400 To: "Sean Lawless" <[email protected]> Cc: "Snmpv3-wg" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: SNMPv3 and FIPS 140-1 References: <[email protected]> From: Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> Organization: Sparta Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:56:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Sean Lawless's message of "Wed, 26 May 2004 19:56:20 +0000") Message-ID: <[email protected]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: [email protected] Precedence: bulk >>>>> On Wed, 26 May 2004 19:56:20 +0000, "Sean Lawless" <[email protected]> said: Sean> Does anyone know how to extend SNMPv3 to be FIPS 140-1 Level 2 Sean> compliant? Specifically, HMAC SHA-1 is not FIPS compliant to my Sean> understanding. Quick web searches led me to believe that SHA-1 with and without HMAC is FIPS-2 compliant at least and I think FIPS-1 as well. But I'm not an expert. Sean> Running SNMPv3 through a VPN seems to defeat its purpose. It is fairly trivial to add other algorithms to USM if you needed to use something different. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta