Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-tewg-measure-05.txt
Jim Boyle <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.tewg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
So I think it is clear that we need to distill what is being recommended. A bit of background - this WG item was intended to make the essential measurements needed well defined enough that the way these "entities" were measured across implementations (e.g. vendors) would be consistent. There was some discussion about "chocolate ice cream" and consistency by an AD at one point but no-one understood the departed AD at that time - let alone now. Suffice it to say that we are looking for a succinct enough set of definitions and recommendations that one could take a look at an an instantiation of that (e.g. a mib) and know if we are measuring things in the correct manner, and do we have a complete set of the measurements we will need. What we have at hand may or may not be a framework, however I think at least some would agree that it is currently too abstract. I recommend we do the following clean up - Somewhere provide a CRISP set of recommendations - Remove all discussion which does not directly re-enforce a recommendation - Run it back through WG last call - Maybe one option will be to remove the WG item completely I have some specific feedback, but I'll do that separately. thanks, Jim