RE: AD review of: draft-ietf-tewg-measure-05.txt

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tewg
Message-ID <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155017C1829@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Inline
> -----Original Message-----
> From: raymond zhang [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: donderdag 1 mei 2003 16:45
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Tewg (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: AD review of: draft-ietf-tewg-measure-05.txt 
> 
> Hi Bert,
> Sorry for the delayed response...
> 
No problem.

> At 03:13 AM 4/25/2003 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> >My summary:
> >
> >- a lot of text... but not very focused and to the point (or at least
> >   I have trouble seeing the main points)
> >- not a "framework", rather an exploration of TE measurement 
> >   related topics (more like  a summary-introduction)
> >- I am not an operator, but I think if I were one, then
> >   - if we were already doing TE measurement stuff (most likely) then
> >     reading it seems a waste of time
> 
> Ray - Well, we have policies and implementations at different 
> degrees for many of the areas touched upon by the draft but 
> not all... It is indeed helpful to look at this as framework for
> any further work to refine our current processes.
> 
Do you really mean "framework" or is it more 
a "pool of things to consider"?

.. snip ..

> >   - Raymond Zhang is positive. He is from info.net ??? is that an operator?
> 
> I am form INFONET ( a global SP).
> 
Thanks for informing me. And appology that I did not know.

.. snip ..

Bert
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.