[TLS] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-08 (Ends 20 26-07-08)

"Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.tls
Message-ID <BN0P110MB141937CE476927BE8993A47690FEA@BN0P110MB1419.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> 
>>"In my opinion the issue is not implementation errors, they can be avoided
>>with the right discipline”
>
> Has there ever been a vulnerability with a crypto, ah, implementation that
> *wasn't* an implementation error?


Yes. The most recent example is SIKE. 


I can’t be bothered to fetch and provide more — that’s left as an exercise for the reader.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
smime.p7s (application/x-pkcs7-signature, 8 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.