[art] Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipa th-dccp-20
Gorry Fairhurst <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:34:54 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.tsvwg |
|---|---|
| Organization | UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27/01/2025 20:16, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned ART-ART reviewer for this draft. Please treat these > comments just like any other last call comments. > > > Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-20 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2025-01-27 > IETF LC End Date: 2024-10-17 > IESG Telechat date: 2025-04-03 > > Summary: Almost Ready > > Thank you for addressing my previous comments. > > > Major Concerns: > > Section 3.2.4: Since none of the Key Types is mandatory-to-implement, it > is possible that two implementations of this specification will not > interoperate. I realize that the Key Type have very different security > implications. Also, mandatory-to-implement does not make that Key Type > mandatory-to-use. Policy has a role too. > > Section 8: The IANA registry indicates that Feature Number 10 was given > a temporary assignment. I expected to see a similar temporary assignment > for Option Type 46. This document seems to depend on that value being > assigned by IANA. > > > Minor Concerns: > > None. > > > Nits: > > Section 3.11.2: Please add white space between the adjacent paragraphs. > > Section 8: s/Sect. Section 3.1 specifies/Section 3.1 specifies/ > > Thanks Russ for this review! Just one wee update: I think your comment on Section 8 might be only editorial. The WG has already approved this (in Feb 2024), and IANA ha actioned a provisional assignment in the registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/dccp-parameters/dccp-parameters.xhtml#dccp-parameters-7 10 Multipath Capable (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-03-12, expires 2025-03-12) [RFC-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-13 <https://www.iana.org/go/draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-13>] I expect the only action could be for the I-D ought to be revised to say that "10" is a provisional allocation. Best wishes, Gorry (TSVWG Co-Chair) _______________________________________________ art mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]