[art] Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipa th-dccp-20

Gorry Fairhurst <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:34:54 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.ietf.tsvwg
Organization UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 27/01/2025 20:16, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned ART-ART reviewer for this draft. Please treat these
> comments just like any other last call comments.
>
>
> Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-20
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2025-01-27
> IETF LC End Date: 2024-10-17
> IESG Telechat date: 2025-04-03
>
> Summary: Almost Ready
>
> Thank you for addressing my previous comments.
>
>
> Major Concerns:
>
> Section 3.2.4: Since none of the Key Types is mandatory-to-implement, it
> is possible that two implementations of this specification will not
> interoperate.  I realize that the Key Type have very different security
> implications.  Also, mandatory-to-implement does not make that Key Type
> mandatory-to-use. Policy has a role too.
>
> Section 8: The IANA registry indicates that Feature Number 10 was given
> a temporary assignment.  I expected to see a similar temporary assignment
> for Option Type 46.  This document seems to depend on that value being
> assigned by IANA.
>
>
> Minor Concerns:
>
> None.
>
>
> Nits:
>
> Section 3.11.2: Please add white space between the adjacent paragraphs.
>
> Section 8: s/Sect.  Section 3.1 specifies/Section 3.1 specifies/
>
>
Thanks Russ for this review!

Just one wee update: I think your comment on Section 8 might be only editorial.
The WG has already approved this (in Feb 2024), and IANA ha actioned a provisional assignment in the registry:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/dccp-parameters/dccp-parameters.xhtml#dccp-parameters-7

10 	Multipath Capable (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-03-12, expires 
2025-03-12) 	[RFC-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-13 
<https://www.iana.org/go/draft-ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp-13>]

I expect the only action could be for the I-D ought to be revised to say 
that "10" is a provisional allocation.

Best wishes,

Gorry

(TSVWG Co-Chair)

_______________________________________________
art mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]