[media-types] Re: Media type review request for draft-ietf-a vtcore-rtp-v3c

"Lauri Ilola \(Nokia\)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.types
Message-ID <AM8PR07MB8294672A3A1E891D6D1D1821FD28A@AM8PR07MB8294.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Murray!

Thank you for the suggestion. The wording that you are proposing is indeed better. I’ll update the draft accordingly.

Kind Regards,
-Lauri

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2025 8:11 PM
To: Lauri Ilola (Nokia) <[email protected]>
Cc: Marius Kleidl <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [media-types] Media type review request for draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c


CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.


The media type registration template looks good to me here.

The draft itself may get some comments about the SHALL NOT text at the end of Section 11; you're asserting a normative constraint against a format that's already defined.  If RTP is incapable of transporting executable content, I think you just need to say that.  On the other hand, if you're saying components of a system using this media type SHALL NOT construct RTP payloads that contain executable content, I think that would be more clear.

-MSK

-MSK

[https://s-install.avcdn.net/ipm/preview/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif]<https://www.norton.com/>
Virus-free.www.norton.com<https://www.norton.com/>

On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 3:51 AM Lauri Ilola (Nokia) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello Marius & Murray,

Thank you for the feedback and suggestions. I’ve made a new version of the draft available hopefully addressing the remaining suggestions (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c/10/). Below you can find a copy of the updated media type registration section:

---

Type name: application

Subtype name: v3c

Required parameters: N/A

Optional parameters: sprop-v3c-unit-header, sprop-v3c-unit-type,
sprop-v3c-vps-id, sprop-v3c-atlas-id, sprop-v3c-attr-idx,
sprop-v3c-attr-part-idx, sprop-v3c-map-idx, sprop-v3c-aux-video-flag,
sprop-v3c-parameter-set, sprop-v3c-tile-id, sprop-v3c-tile-id-pres,
sprop-v3c-atlas-data, sprop-v3c-common-atlas-data, sprop-v3c-sei,
v3c-ptl-level-idc, v3c-ptl-tier-flag, v3c-ptl-codec-idc,
v3c-ptl-toolset-idc, v3c-ptl-rec-idc and sprop-max-don-diff.

Encoding considerations: framed

Security considerations: Please see Section 11<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-10.html#name-security-considerations>

Interoperability considerations: N/A

Published specification: Please refer to ISO/IEC 23090-5<https://www.iso.org/standard/89030.html>

Applications that use this media type: Any application that relies on
V3C-based media services over RTP

Additional information: N/A

Person & email address to contact for further information: Lauri Ilola ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) or Lukasz Kondrad ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)

Intended usage: COMMON

Restrictions on usage: N/A

Author: See Authors' Addresses section of this memo.

Change controller: IETF [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Provisional registration? (standards tree only): No

---

Please let me know if there are any remaining questions or concerns that would need to be addressed.

Kind Regards,
-Lauri

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday, 23. July 2025 at 10:53
To: Marius Kleidl <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [media-types] Media type review request for draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>


CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext<http://nok.it/ext> for additional information.


Hello Marius,

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:04 PM Marius Kleidl <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Type name: application

Subtype name: v3c

Required parameters: N/A

Optional parameters: sprop-v3c-unit-header, sprop-v3c-unit-type, sprop-v3c-vps-id, sprop-v3c-atlas-id, sprop-v3c-attr-idx, sprop-v3c-attr-part-idx, sprop-v3c-map-idx, sprop-v3c-aux-video-flag, sprop-v3c-parameter-set, sprop-v3c-tile-id, sprop-v3c-tile-id-pres, sprop-v3c-atlas-data, sprop-v3c-common-atlas-data, sprop-v3c-sei, v3c-ptl-level-idc, v3c-ptl-tier-flag, v3c-ptl-codec-idc, v3c-ptl-toolset-idc, v3c-ptl-rec-idc and sprop-max-don-diff.

Encoding considerations: This type is only defined for transfer via RTP [RFC3550<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-08.html#RFC3550>].

Please see RFC 6838 Section 4.8 for a list of valid values here.

Security considerations: Please see Section 11<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-08.html#Security-considerations>.

There's a large number of other documents referenced in your Section 11.  I didn't go into them all, but it's good there's a full treatment done.  The only sticking point for me would be that somewhere in that tree of security recommendations, the question RFC 6838 poses about executable content is answered.

Interoperability considerations: N/A

Published specification: Please refer to [ISO.IEC.23090-5<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-08.html#ISO.IEC.23090-5>]

Applications that use this media type: Any application that relies on V3C-based media services over RTP

Additional information: N/A

Person & email address to contact for further information:

This needs to be completed.

Intended usage: COMMON

Restrictions on usage: N/A

Author: See Authors' Addresses section of this memo.

Change controller: IETF [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Provisional registration? (standards tree only): No

The optional parameters are defined as: (from https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-v3c-08.html#name-optional-parameters-definit)
[...]

This bit isn't necessary (or part of the template); the referenced published specification is sufficient.

-MSK

_______________________________________________
media-types mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.