Re: UDLR Experiment I-D and IPv6 issue

> I am just wondering why you are considering IGMP here since this
> protocol is not mentioned as part of the spec of RFC3077 ?

At this moment, I just said we needed to *translate* IGMP, ARP, ...
from rfc3077.

> For 1, the main issue would be to use an IPv6 delivery header for DTCP
> instead of IPv4 as defined in the rfc. The current DTCP payload format
> allows to advertise IPv6 FBIP. 

This kind of statement can be mentioned, I meant.

> For 2, my undertanding of rfc2784 is that we could use IPv6 as delivery
> header for GRE, although at the date rfc2784 was published, only IPv4
> was used. From appendix 9:

Same of above.

> Does this prevent us from using IPv6 ?

I've never said, "something prevents".
Again, I believe "we need the translation for IPv6, in order to show
UDLR can work for IPv6". And I showed "which parts should be
translated".
--
Hitoshi Asaeda