RE: Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-urlreg-noreg-00.txt

I think I am just going to agree with both Larry and Erik on this. I propose
Larry for the URI review group chair. =)

	Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Larry Masinter [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 19, 1997 12:26 AM
> To:	Yaron Goland
> Cc:	Ian King; [email protected]; Rich Petke
> Subject:	Re: Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-urlreg-noreg-00.txt
> 
> Yaron Goland wrote:
> > 
> > I understand but we can't have a situation where a small unelected
> largely
> > unaccountable group of people unilaterally decide what is and is not
> > allowable. It violates the entire IETF process.
> 
> In the end, the IESG decides. In their wisdom, the let IETF working groups
> advise them.
> 
> > There must be an appeal
> > process.
> 
> clearly
> 
> > I think the "appeal" process should be the existence of a permanent
> > mailing list.
> 
>  [email protected]
> 
> Actually, they have regular meetings, too.
> 
> > Anyone who is interested in URIs can join that mailing list.
> 
> No, that's not process, it's chaos.
> 
> > If the advisory panel decides to reject a URI then a notice will be
> posted
> > to the mailing list and those who are interested can discuss it.
> 
> The appeal process usually involves soliciting the community. Actually,
> anyone can join the ietf-types list too. I'm thinking of something of
> that nature.