RE: Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-urlreg-noreg-00.txt

Do we really need a review group?  When I sent my original mail, I was
thinking that the URL scheme registration doc would be another measure
of whether a proposed doc is sufficient -- sort of like whether you
address security and i18n.  :-)  Does this create a hole in the case of
i-ds?  That's probably too early in the process to be worried about it.


But you're right, Yaron, Larry would be a great choice for the "Lord of
URIs".  :-)  And in any case, this is clearly an agenda item for
Washington.  Any others?  I'm putting the agenda together....

-- Ian

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Yaron Goland 
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 19, 1997 2:38 PM
> To:	'Larry Masinter'
> Cc:	Ian King; [email protected]; Rich Petke
> Subject:	RE: Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-urlreg-noreg-00.txt
> 
> I think I am just going to agree with both Larry and Erik on this. I
> propose
> Larry for the URI review group chair. =)
> 
> 	Yaron
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Larry Masinter [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Sent:	Wednesday, November 19, 1997 12:26 AM
> > To:	Yaron Goland
> > Cc:	Ian King; [email protected]; Rich Petke
> > Subject:	Re: Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-urlreg-noreg-00.txt
> > 
> > Yaron Goland wrote:
> > > 
> > > I understand but we can't have a situation where a small unelected
> > largely
> > > unaccountable group of people unilaterally decide what is and is
> not
> > > allowable. It violates the entire IETF process.
> > 
> > In the end, the IESG decides. In their wisdom, the let IETF working
> groups
> > advise them.
> > 
> > > There must be an appeal
> > > process.
> > 
> > clearly
> > 
> > > I think the "appeal" process should be the existence of a
> permanent
> > > mailing list.
> > 
> >  [email protected]
> > 
> > Actually, they have regular meetings, too.
> > 
> > > Anyone who is interested in URIs can join that mailing list.
> > 
> > No, that's not process, it's chaos.
> > 
> > > If the advisory panel decides to reject a URI then a notice will
> be
> > posted
> > > to the mailing list and those who are interested can discuss it.
> > 
> > The appeal process usually involves soliciting the community.
> Actually,
> > anyone can join the ietf-types list too. I'm thinking of something
> of
> > that nature.