Re: [URN] Re: Relative URLs and URNs

On Fri, 31 Jan 1997, Daniel LaLiberte wrote:

> Ryan Moats writes:
>  > Just to make everyting clear, if the client does not understand the
>  > namespace, should treat the NSS as an opaque string, yes? (At least,
>  > I certainly hope so...)
> 
> Nothing else makes sense.
> But maybe such a client should commit suicide. :-)

Not necessarily. With the number of URL schemes and URN namespaces
increasing, as well as the complexity of other things the client has
to do, it might be a very good implementation strategy to delegate
all the URL/URN resolution stuff to a *local* server (proxy).

Regards,	Martin.