Re: GVAT registration request
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.urn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, I will send the registration request to IANA. Peter On 5/2/23 4:22 AM, Miksa, Tomasz wrote: > Great, thank you very much! > > I understand that the next step is the publication of the template on the IANA website and this will happen "automatically", right? > > Tomasz > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars G. Svensson <[email protected]> > Sent: piątek, 21 kwietnia 2023 18:25 > To: 'Peter Saint-Andre' <[email protected]>; Miksa, Tomasz <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: AW: [urn] GVAT registration request > > +1 > > Best, > > Lars > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: urn [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Peter Saint-Andre > Gesendet: Freitag, 21. April 2023 17:38 > An: Miksa, Tomasz <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [urn] GVAT registration request > > This looks good. I approve. > > Peter > > On 4/21/23 6:12 AM, Miksa, Tomasz wrote: >> Thanks again for the careful review of our specifications. You helped us improve it. >> >> I enclose hopefully the final revision. I made the following changes: >> 1. Fixed the notation for the object as suggested by Dale. It is now: >> 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / %x2D). I know that it allows a >> situation in which the object consists of "-" only, which may not be >> ideal, but I believe it is better to keep the formulation simple, >> rather than come up with something more complex like 1*(%x41–5A / >> %x61–7A / %x30–39) (%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / %x2D) >> >> 2. Rephrased the Resolution section as suggested by @Juha. It captures very well the gist of what we are up to. >> >> Apart from this, no other changes were made. >> >> Cheers >> Tomasz >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lars G. Svensson <[email protected]> >> Sent: piątek, 21 kwietnia 2023 11:26 >> To: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>; Dale R. Worley >> <[email protected]>; Miksa, Tomasz <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [urn] GVAT registration request >> >> Having read the specification, I have no comments and agree with the registration of GVAT as a urn namespace. >> >> Best, >> >> Lars >> >> Am 18.04.2023 um 22:38 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: >>> On 4/18/23 12:43 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote: >>>> I have only one remaining comment. There appears to be a typo: >>>> >>>> "Miksa, Tomasz" <[email protected]> writes: >>>> ... >>>>> Ad. object >>>>> Yes, we are aware of the lack of German characters. We really >>>>> intend to ensure no semantics in the identifiers. One change we did >>>>> was to introduce the "-", to have better overlap with UUID and >>>>> DOIs, in case any of them is used in the future. Now it is: >>>>> 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 ) %x2D >>>> ... >>>>> object = 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 ) >>>>> %x2D >>>> ... >>>> >>>> As written, this means one or more alphanumeric characters, then >>>> always followed by "-". I assume that the intent is >>>> >>>> object = 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / >>>> %x2D >>>> ) >>>> >>>> that is, alphanumerics arbitrarily mixed with "-". >>> >>> Good catch, and agreed. >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> urn mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn > > _______________________________________________ > urn mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn _______________________________________________ urn mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn