Re: GVAT registration request

The GVAT namespace has been added to the registry:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml

Peter

On 5/2/23 7:32 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Yes, I will send the registration request to IANA.
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 5/2/23 4:22 AM, Miksa, Tomasz wrote:
>> Great, thank you very much!
>>
>> I understand that the next step is the publication of the template on 
>> the IANA website and this will happen "automatically", right?
>>
>> Tomasz
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lars G. Svensson <[email protected]>
>> Sent: piątek, 21 kwietnia 2023 18:25
>> To: 'Peter Saint-Andre' <[email protected]>; Miksa, Tomasz 
>> <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: AW: [urn] GVAT registration request
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Lars
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: urn [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Peter Saint-Andre
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 21. April 2023 17:38
>> An: Miksa, Tomasz <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Betreff: Re: [urn] GVAT registration request
>>
>> This looks good. I approve.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On 4/21/23 6:12 AM, Miksa, Tomasz wrote:
>>> Thanks again for the careful review of our specifications. You helped 
>>> us improve it.
>>>
>>> I enclose hopefully the final revision. I made the following changes:
>>> 1. Fixed the notation for the object as suggested by Dale. It is now:
>>> 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / %x2D). I know that it allows a
>>> situation in which the object consists of "-" only, which may not be
>>> ideal, but I believe it is better to keep the formulation simple,
>>> rather than come up with something more complex like 1*(%x41–5A /
>>> %x61–7A / %x30–39) (%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / %x2D)
>>>
>>> 2. Rephrased the Resolution section as suggested by @Juha. It 
>>> captures very well the gist of what we are up to.
>>>
>>> Apart from this, no other changes were made.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Tomasz
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Lars G. Svensson <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: piątek, 21 kwietnia 2023 11:26
>>> To: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>; Dale R. Worley
>>> <[email protected]>; Miksa, Tomasz <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [urn] GVAT registration request
>>>
>>> Having read the specification, I have no comments and agree with the 
>>> registration of GVAT as a urn namespace.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Lars
>>>
>>> Am 18.04.2023 um 22:38 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>>>> On 4/18/23 12:43 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>>>>> I have only one remaining comment.  There appears to be a typo:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Miksa, Tomasz" <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Ad. object
>>>>>> Yes, we are aware of the lack of German characters. We really
>>>>>> intend to ensure no semantics in the identifiers. One change we did
>>>>>> was to introduce the "-", to have better overlap with UUID and
>>>>>> DOIs, in case any of them is used in the future. Now it is:
>>>>>> 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 ) %x2D
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>        object                 = 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 )
>>>>>> %x2D
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> As written, this means one or more alphanumeric characters, then
>>>>> always followed by "-".  I assume that the intent is
>>>>>
>>>>>         object                 = 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 /
>>>>> %x2D
>>>>> )
>>>>>
>>>>> that is, alphanumerics arbitrarily mixed with "-".
>>>>
>>>> Good catch, and agreed.
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> urn mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> urn mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
> 

_______________________________________________
urn mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn