Re: Registration request for urn:thread:

Esko Dijk <[email protected]> writes:
>> My opinion is "No", unless it's agreed that *all* non-members are
>> licensed to see, copy, and discuss it in any forum.  
>
> What we could also do is state "None" for the Documentation field,
> which would cover the case that nothing is publicly available. This
> was e.g. done in the CTA assignment:

Then I would argue that we shouldn't approve the registration request,
as it doesn't conform to the IETF principle of openness.  As you note,
we have approved such applications in the past, but retrospectively I
think that was mistaken.

Dale