[urn] Re: Registration request for urn:thread:

> FWIW, the new text looks fine to me.

Good to hear. 

I now made the final changes I wanted to make: so a new sub-namespace registration can practically reserve a particular sn-content format for future extensions, that use the same sub-namespace. So only the sn-content is extended in that case, but in a way that meets the initial constraints.  So that parsers of any versions (old and new) can handle the extensions properly.

Esko

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2024 18:25
To: Esko Dijk <[email protected]>; Dale R. Worley <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [urn] Re: Registration request for urn:thread:

On 11/21/24 9:19 AM, Esko Dijk wrote:

> Agree that resolving this a priori is best; I've now started on this path. Any comments on the updated text are welcome, in the meantime.

FWIW, the new text looks fine to me.

Peter

_______________________________________________
urn mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]