[urn] Re: Registration request for urn:thread:

Esko Dijk <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Dec 2024 09:18:46 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.urn
Message-ID <DU0P190MB1978A13811AD5A6924251A84FD302@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Thanks again for the review feedback. Based on the RFC 8141 6.3 process, I've now filed a request to IANA with pointers to the final v1 template and to the review email thread.
(If I still missed anything, just let me know.)

Esko

-----Original Message-----
From: Esko Dijk 
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 12:13
To: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>; Dale R. Worley <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [urn] Re: Registration request for urn:thread:

> FWIW, the new text looks fine to me.

Good to hear. 

I now made the final changes I wanted to make: so a new sub-namespace registration can practically reserve a particular sn-content format for future extensions, that use the same sub-namespace. So only the sn-content is extended in that case, but in a way that meets the initial constraints.  So that parsers of any versions (old and new) can handle the extensions properly.

Esko
_______________________________________________
urn mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]