[urn] Re: Registration request for urn:thread:

Actually, the process is for the expert review team to make the request 
of IANA. The file seems to be at [1] so I will contact IANA, since we 
haven't heard any concerns from the other expert review team members.

Peter

[1] 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ThreadGroup/urn-thread-registry/refs/heads/main/urn-registration-v1.txt

On 12/5/24 2:18 AM, Esko Dijk wrote:
> Thanks again for the review feedback. Based on the RFC 8141 6.3 process, I've now filed a request to IANA with pointers to the final v1 template and to the review email thread.
> (If I still missed anything, just let me know.)
> 
> Esko
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Esko Dijk
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2024 12:13
> To: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>; Dale R. Worley <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [urn] Re: Registration request for urn:thread:
> 
>> FWIW, the new text looks fine to me.
> 
> Good to hear.
> 
> I now made the final changes I wanted to make: so a new sub-namespace registration can practically reserve a particular sn-content format for future extensions, that use the same sub-namespace. So only the sn-content is extended in that case, but in a way that meets the initial constraints.  So that parsers of any versions (old and new) can handle the extensions properly.
> 
> Esko

_______________________________________________
urn mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]