Re: Case-sensitivity in newsgroup names and message-IDs
"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:28:07 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.usenet.format |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In <[email protected]> Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: >"Charles Lindsey" <[email protected]> writes: >> USEFOR makes it clear that all newsgroups names SHOULD be in LC, but >> recognizes that some existing ones might have UC in them, in which >> case offering to NNTP (or to whatever else) exactly what the >> 'official' name of the group is (as it appears in a checkgroups, if >> you are lucky enough to be in a hierarchy that publishes those) is >> likely to succeed (mostly). But USEFOR makes it clear that all _new_ >> groups MUST be LC throughout. >> >> So the only thing you are entitled to "expect" is that if you offfer >> LC names in order to retrieve LC groups, then that will _always_ work. >> Anything else is problematical, so don't do it. >The problem is, we don't actually say this anywhere that I can see, and >historically several NNTP documents have claimed that newsgroup names >are case-insensitive. The current NNTP standard says: I think it is what section 3.1.4 of USEFOR is _trying_ to say (at least, that is what my analysis was based on). Maybe a little further word-smithing in USEFOR would help clarifiy things? -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: [email protected] Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5