[Int-area] Re: [v6ops] Re: NDP for RFC4291 Sec. 2. 5.5.1. IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Addresses for v4-w-v6-nh Forwar ding/RFC8950 at RS

Moin,
> At the risk of raining on some parades, rfc8950 at internet exchanges
> is experimental so far. The long term future of this approach isn't
> clear, given that its intention is to relieve the impact of lack of 
> availability of ipv4, which is readily available at modest cost, at 
> least relative to the overall cost of running an infrastructure asset
> like an IXP.


Yeah, I generally agree that it currently is just that.

However, getting into enabling it becoming more... why not? Also...
better than renumbering? ;-)

With best regards,
Tobias

-- 
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M [email protected]
Pronouns: he/him/his

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]