[Int-area] Re: [GROW] Re: [v6ops] Re: NDP for RF C4291 Sec. 2.5.5.1. IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Addresses for v4-w-v6-nh Forwarding/RFC8950 at RS

Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:34:23 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.int,gmane.ietf.grow,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tobias Fiebig wrote on 08/04/2025 14:04:
> ...is kind of useful here, because it also gives an IX an easy way to
> do proxy "ARP" for those v4 members, without actually sending ARP that
> would be misunderstood by them.

Now I've seen "IX" and "proxy arp" in the same sentence.

As a proposal.

Can we take the entire idea away and throw it into the nearest volcano?

Nick

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]