RE: Some questions

Can you give me a link to a definition?  The stuff 
I've found via Google seems rather verbose :-)

Thanks,
Misha


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Kearney [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 19 March 2003 14:30
To: Misha Wolf; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Some questions


have you considered using the RDF Friend of a Friend schema?  Many of the same
people involved in vCard XML also participate in RDF and FoaF.

-Bill Kearney

----- Original Message -----
From: "Misha Wolf" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 8:42 AM
Subject: Some questions


>
> I'm at a meeting of the International Press Telecommunications
> Council (IPTC).  We want to use vCard to embed people's details
> in NewsML and, like lots of others, have found that there seems
> to be no standard way of representing vCard in XML.  In addition
> to the expired Internet Drafts, we've found:
>
>    Representing vCard Objects in RDF/XML
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf
>
> and:
>
>    JEP-0054: vcard-temp
>    http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0054.html
>
> One of the differences is in the use of case, eg "Family" vs
> "FAMILY".  What are others doing re case?
>
> Another question concerns extensions, eg for IM.  Are people
> adding IM addresses to vCards?  If so, how?
>
> Thanks,
> Misha
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------- -
>         Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>
> Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
> information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
> sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
> the views of Reuters Ltd.



--------------------------------------------------------------- -
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.