RE: WG Last Call on critical content
"Glenn Parsons" <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:35:41 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.vpim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C27FBB.D198783C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Well I am glad you are paying attention :-) Eric suggested we needed to last call again -- and I rushed this message out today before I thought about it while I was in the middle of something else. My mistake. Thanks for clearing it up. Let's retract this last call. Glenn. > ---------- > From: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:01 PM > To: Parsons, Glenn [CAR:6L81:EXCH] > Cc: IETF VPIM List (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [VPIM] WG Last Call on critical content > > > This is a two week Working Group last call notice for the Critical > Content > > draft to end on Nov 8th. This draft is proposed to go to Draft Standard > RFC > > status. It is a key component of the Internet Voice Mail (IVM) > profile. > > > These draft have changed notably since their inception, and the recent > > revisions reflect several decisions made based on comments outlined by > Eric > > at the last meeting. I believe they reflect consensus. > > > The drafts are in the Internet repositories: > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-cc-08.txt > > > Thanks in advance for your help in reviewing these drafts. > > There appears to be considerable confusion here. This document was last > called > on 10-Jun-2002 for proposed. Since then it has been on the IESG agenda > twice, > with revisions to it subsequently each time. It is on the IESG agenda for > 31-Oct again; hopefully it will pass this time. > > The time is long since past for working group feedback on this document. > Nor > is a move to draft appropriate at this time; the document hasn't even made > it to proposed yet. > > Ned > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C27FBB.D198783C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2655.35"> <TITLE>RE: [VPIM] WG Last Call on critical content</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Well I am glad you = are paying attention :-)</FONT> </P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Eric suggested we = needed to last call again -- and I rushed this message out today before = I thought about it while I was in the middle of something else. = My mistake. Thanks for clearing it up.</FONT></P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Let's retract this = last call.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Glenn.</FONT> </P> <UL> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">----------</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">From:</FONT></B> <FONT = SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">[email protected]</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Sent:</FONT></B> <FONT = SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:01 PM</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">To:</FONT></B> = <FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Parsons, Glenn [CAR:6L81:EXCH]</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Cc:</FONT></B> = <FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">IETF VPIM List (E-mail)</FONT> <BR><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Subject:</FONT></B> = <FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Re: = [VPIM] WG Last Call on critical content</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">> This is a two week Working Group = last call notice for the Critical Content</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">> draft to end on Nov 8th. = This draft is proposed to go to Draft Standard RFC</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">> status. It is a key = component of the Internet Voice Mail (IVM) profile.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">> These draft have changed notably = since their inception, and the recent</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">> revisions reflect several = decisions made based on comments outlined by Eric</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">> at the last meeting. I = believe they reflect consensus.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">> The drafts are in the Internet = repositories:</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">></FONT><U> <FONT = COLOR=3D"#0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco"><A = HREF=3D"http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-cc-08.txt" = TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-cc= -08.txt</A></FONT></U> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">> Thanks in advance for your help = in reviewing these drafts.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">There appears to be considerable = confusion here. This document was last called</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">on 10-Jun-2002 for proposed. Since = then it has been on the IESG agenda twice,</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">with revisions to it subsequently = each time. It is on the IESG agenda for</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">31-Oct again; hopefully it will pass = this time.</FONT> </P> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">The time is long since past for = working group feedback on this document. Nor</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">is a move to draft appropriate at = this time; the document hasn't even made</FONT> <BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Monaco">it to proposed yet.</FONT> </P> <P> = = = <FONT SIZE=3D2 = FACE=3D"Monaco">Ned</FONT> </P> <BR> </UL> </BODY> </HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C27FBB.D198783C-- ---------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent to you, since you are subscribed to [email protected]. You can manage your subscription at http://www.neystadt.org/cgi-bin/majordomo