Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5913 (5890)

Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.x509
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for checking; I went with Editorial/Verified since I found Jim's
argument compelling (but we can ask the RFC Editor to change it if we feel
otherwise).

-Ben

On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 01:37:34PM -0500, Sean Turner wrote:
> +1
> 
> > On Nov 1, 2019, at 07:57, Santosh Chokhani <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I as coauthor of the document is ok with the change.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pkix [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 7:12 PM
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5913 (5890)
> > 
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5913, "Clearance
> > Attribute and Authority Clearance Constraints Certificate Extension".
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5890
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Technical
> > Reported by: Russ Housley <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Section: Section 3
> > 
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> >     id-pe-authorityClearanceConstraints OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
> >       iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5)
> >       mechanisms(5) pkix(7) pe(1) 21 }
> > 
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> >   id-pe-clearanceConstraints OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
> >     { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5)
> >       mechanisms(5) pkix(7) pe(1) 21 }
> > 
> > Notes
> > -----
> > Section 3 and Appendix A use different names for the object identifier.
> > They should match.  I propose changing Section 3 to match Appendix A.
> > 
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
> > "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
> > decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and
> > edit the report, if necessary. 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC5913 (draft-ietf-pkix-authorityclearanceconstraints-03)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : Clearance Attribute and Authority Clearance
> > Constraints Certificate Extension
> > Publication Date    : June 2010
> > Author(s)           : S. Turner, S. Chokhani
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
> > Area                : Security
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > pkix mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > pkix mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
> 

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.