Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5913 (5890)
Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.x509 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for checking; I went with Editorial/Verified since I found Jim's argument compelling (but we can ask the RFC Editor to change it if we feel otherwise). -Ben On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 01:37:34PM -0500, Sean Turner wrote: > +1 > > > On Nov 1, 2019, at 07:57, Santosh Chokhani <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I as coauthor of the document is ok with the change. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pkix [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of RFC Errata System > > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 7:12 PM > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: [pkix] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5913 (5890) > > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5913, "Clearance > > Attribute and Authority Clearance Constraints Certificate Extension". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5890 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Technical > > Reported by: Russ Housley <[email protected]> > > > > Section: Section 3 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > id-pe-authorityClearanceConstraints OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { > > iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) > > mechanisms(5) pkix(7) pe(1) 21 } > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > id-pe-clearanceConstraints OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= > > { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) > > mechanisms(5) pkix(7) pe(1) 21 } > > > > Notes > > ----- > > Section 3 and Appendix A use different names for the object identifier. > > They should match. I propose changing Section 3 to match Appendix A. > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use > > "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a > > decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and > > edit the report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC5913 (draft-ietf-pkix-authorityclearanceconstraints-03) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : Clearance Attribute and Authority Clearance > > Constraints Certificate Extension > > Publication Date : June 2010 > > Author(s) : S. Turner, S. Chokhani > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) > > Area : Security > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pkix mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pkix mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix > _______________________________________________ pkix mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix