Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-23: (with DISCUSS)

Brian Haberman <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:27:23 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.xmpp
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi Peter,

On 6/10/15 2:07 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:

>> I agree that a proper reference to 6874 would be useful.  Is there any
>> need to mention the potential for a literal to include the zone id?
> 
> How is this text?
> 
> ###
> 
>       domainpart   = IP-literal / IPv4address / ifqdn
>                      ;
>                      ; the "IPv4address" and "IP-literal" rules are
>                      ; defined in RFC 3896 and RFC 6874 respectively,
>                      ; and the first-match-wins (a.k.a. "greedy")
>                      ; algorithm described in Appendix B of RFC 3986
>                      ; applies to the matching process
> 
> <snip/>
> 
>       Implementation Note: Reuse of the IP-literal rule from [RFC6874]
>       implies that IPv6 addresses are enclosed in square brackets (i.e.,
>       beginning with '[' and ; ending with ']'), which was not the case
>       with the definition of the XMPP address format in [RFC3920] but
>       which was changed in [RFC6122].  Also note that the IP-literal
>       rule was updated between RFC 3986 and RFC 6874 to optionally add a
>       zone identifier to any literal address.
> 
> ###
> 

This all works for me.  Thanks for the quick response and turn around!

Brian

_______________________________________________
xmpp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 481 B)