Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis-23: (with DISCUSS)

On 6/10/15 1:27 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 6/10/15 2:07 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
>
>>> I agree that a proper reference to 6874 would be useful.  Is there any
>>> need to mention the potential for a literal to include the zone id?
>>
>> How is this text?
>>
>> ###
>>
>>        domainpart   = IP-literal / IPv4address / ifqdn
>>                       ;
>>                       ; the "IPv4address" and "IP-literal" rules are
>>                       ; defined in RFC 3896 and RFC 6874 respectively,
>>                       ; and the first-match-wins (a.k.a. "greedy")
>>                       ; algorithm described in Appendix B of RFC 3986
>>                       ; applies to the matching process
>>
>> <snip/>
>>
>>        Implementation Note: Reuse of the IP-literal rule from [RFC6874]
>>        implies that IPv6 addresses are enclosed in square brackets (i.e.,
>>        beginning with '[' and ; ending with ']'), which was not the case
>>        with the definition of the XMPP address format in [RFC3920] but
>>        which was changed in [RFC6122].  Also note that the IP-literal
>>        rule was updated between RFC 3986 and RFC 6874 to optionally add a
>>        zone identifier to any literal address.
>>
>> ###
>>
>
> This all works for me.  Thanks for the quick response and turn around!

Great. I'll post a revised I-D after the telechat.

Peter