Re: [dhcwg] WG consensus action: ACCEPT LL34 better transition to routable from v4LL using DHCP
Robert Elz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.zeroconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:28:30 -0700
From: Alex Karahalios <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
| Does this mean that once a DHCP address is established that the machine
| will not participate in IPv4LL? If this is the case, then it would be
| problematic in that if another node is brought online that does not
| obtain an DHCP address (either it does not want to or DHCP server is
| down), then that node cannot communicate with the first node using
| IPv4LL.
This is simply not true. Go back and read the list archives.
kre