Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL54] Consistent terminology for out of scope

"Philip Nye" <[email protected]> Fri, 7 May 2004 11:05:57 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.zeroconf
Organization Engineering Arts
Message-ID <016a01c43423$46197630$131010ac@aldebaran>
> Lets be consistent. Can we pick one phrase? Either "outside the scope of
> this document" or "left to a future document".

I really don't care which phrase we use, nor do I mind using both in different places, but it is way too late to make trivial changes like this.

Philip