Re: Edits to draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-17.txt

Hi Stuart, folks,
   The A48 is not the place to correct any technical oddities remaining 
in a document
after the WG *and* the IESG have worked on it.
 From what I've read, this text and the whole document reflects the 
opinion and level
of understanding of the majority of the WG. I'm sure you would have 
heard if this
were not so. Thus, please let the pain stop - put it back and get the 
RFC "out the door".

Conversely, in keeping with your explanation/rationale, I trust that 
Apple will
interpret this *suggestion* to the best interest of its customers, as 
always.

all the best,
   Lawrence

On 9 Feb 2005, at 20:00, John Schnizlein wrote:
> The 48-hour edit period is not the right time and place to reverse a 
> contentious decision that went back and forth for some time before it 
> was settled.
> John
>
> On Feb 8, 2005, at 10:59 PM, Stuart Cheshire wrote:
>> During the "authors 48 hours" final review period we found various 
>> minor
>> changes that needed to be made to the document.
> ...
>> 4c. Set the IPv4 TTL to 1?
>>    ...
>> This text has been removed.