Re: Edits to draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-17.txt
Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:43:53 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.zeroconf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>The 48-hour edit period is not the right time and place to reverse a >contentious decision that went back and forth for some time before it >was settled. > >John I already said, if this is the only point of disagreement, then I will accept it and we should publish the RFC. My point was not to reverse a contentious decision, but to wonder how it got in the document at all, given that the the apparent working group consensus on John Schnizlein's proposed text was "Rejected". <http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/ZEROCONF/ll29.html> <http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/ZEROCONF/issues.html> If this is the only point of disagreement, then I will accept it and we should publish the RFC. Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> * Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Computer, Inc. * www.stuartcheshire.org