Re: Anybody there?
John Wilson <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:40:54 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.cryptography.uk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJkBBXX+A7f18Y_zczqqbdpOX+1y3Leb0T+EeR+iiGisCDwvuw@mail.gmail.com> |
This thread on Twitter by David Allen Green discusses this point https://twitter.com/davidallengreen/status/1185820413718421504. On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 18:52, Roland Perry <[email protected]> wrote: > > In article <[email protected]>, Clive D.W. Feather > <[email protected]> writes > > >He wrote it but didn't sign it. Then wrote another one saying "delay would > >be a mistake". > > On another list, people said a week or two ago that sending two letters > would be a "breach of the Padfield principle (Padfield v Minister of > Agriculture [1968] AC 997) which means that the government cannot > exercise its powers in order to frustrate a statute" > > But I haven't followed that up to see if such a principle would in fact > apply (although I think he *is* exercising a power by writing both the > 2nd and third letter). > > -- > Roland Perry >