Re: SunnComm new CD mangling technology.
Henry Gomersall <whg21-KWPb1pKIrIJaa/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 12:34, [email protected] wrote: > "This stuff works," SunnComm Chief Executive Officer Peter Jacobs said. "The > science is real. You can't hear it when (a piece of music) is being used > properly, and you can do nothing but hear it when a song is copied > improperly." Looking at the "technology" page it is clear that this has no effect on CD to CD copying (as one would expect). The "technology" appears to work by causing similar artifacts to that which occurs by transcoding. In fact, this may as well be (and indeed, probably is) simply a closed lossy codec. If I wanted to protect music from reencoding, this is how I would do it. The net result is something pretty useless. I certainly wouldn't buy a CD I couldn't rip and encode (and it wouldn't be to share). If I buy a CD, I want a 16bit 44kHz PCM representation of the original master, not after a version that has been through a psycho-acoustic mangler. hen -- Henry Gomersall Trinity College, Cambridge http://www.heng.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ Please avoid sending me any MS WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html or http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3154479.stm "If your only contribution is to quote another, that is no contibution at all."