Re: Annoying FACT infomercial

iriXx <iriXx-i/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr
Organization iriXx
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Henry Gomersall wrote:

>On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 16:31, Toby Woodwark wrote:
>  
>
>>Before I do, has anyone else seen this ad?  Is this a recent/ubiquitous
>>phenomenon? If you have seen it, do you think there good grounds for a
>>complaint, or should I just fume silently?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I've recently seen an ad by FACT that was pretty aggressive. I assume it
>was the same one. The ad is clearly trying to re-enforce the "copying ==
>theft == evil" paradigm.
>
>It made me laugh when the branding iron with the copyright c appeared.
>My first expectation was to get a copyleft brand appearing. I'm spending
>far to much time reading about free software and creative commons. ;)
>
>hen
>  
>
lol... actually its true... as an etcher, i know all too well that 
brands print in reverse.....

FACT advocate copyleft as an alternative to 'piracy' on the high seas?....

m~

-- 
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. 

--Benjamin Franklin


       |\      _,,,---,,_
 ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_     HTTP 503: Too Busy
      |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL


 .::. www.iriXx.org .::. www.copyleftmedia.org.uk .::.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.