Re: An alternative to levies on copyright
João Miguel Neves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A Dom, 2004-02-29 às 00:05, Andrew Rendle escreveu: > João Miguel Neves wrote: > > As for the non transferability, I don't see the issue. I don't > > understand why a "no exclusive deals" implies "no tranferability of > > rights". > > > > It doesn't, but for "no exclusive licences" to be useful, it would have > to be accompanied by "no transfer of rights", otherwise a publisher > could simply insist upon a transfer of rights rather than an exclusive > licence, which would defeat the whole point of banning them. > OK, transfer of copyright is an exclusive deal by another name. It wouldn't be acceptable. I don't know any legislation were you can do an exclusive deal that's different from a transfer of copyright. Remember that we only need to make distribution rights non-exclusive and non-transferable. -- João Miguel Neves
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAQlrnGFkMfesLN9wRAscrAJ9LIOpbFOJoT9SFY5yZ1yQLTJ4FKwCfasaI TfElk2ZHihs5PCkgo1CySqw= =gNT6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----