Re: The BBC again

Tom Chance <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Further to my previous e-mail, since this has come up a lot, could people help 
me build up a list of BBC articles that show clear bias, on, in fact, any 
subject? I've made a start here:

http://www.newtolinux.org.uk/wiki/index.php/BBC

It would help not just us but also the FFII who are now planning some sort of 
effective response.

Thanks,
Tom

On Thursday 11 Mar 2004 14:45, Tom Chance wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The BBC have done it again, giving undue coverage to one side of a debate:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3501964.stm
>
> I think someone with an @ffii or @affs or @ukcdr e-mail address ought to
> write a strongly worded letter to the BBC, asking that they allow the other
> side to have it's say. I'm thinking it should mention in passing Sklyarov,
> the actions of the RIAA and SCO and the slew of legislation going through
> related to digital rights, showing them that there is a pattern and that
> thus far, with the exception of a few Bill Thompson entries, they've only
> really presented the pro-industry point of view. It's extremely bad
> journalism to only present the views of one side.
>
> I would send such an e-mail myself, offering to write the article myself,
> but I don't think I'd have much impact, as they'd have no reason to take me
> for any more than a random angry young man. But If someone with an e-mail
> address that gave them a definite association with an organisation "on the
> other side" e-mailed them, maybe it might work?
>
> I know we've complained to the BBC before, but perhaps if we offer an
> article presenting our side, rather than simple complaints, we might get
> somewhere?
>
> Regards,
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Free-sklyarov-uk mailing list
> Free-sklyarov-uk-Sspga/[email protected]
> http://mailman.xenoclast.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/free-sklyarov-uk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.