Re: Corrupt CD updates, Jun-2004

On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 12:03 +0100, Andy Buckley wrote:
> The "effective" bit is probably best judged by looking at how prevalent
> songs from "protected" CDs are on file sharing networks --- that's
> surely what the record companies will be looking for. I have no idea how
> this has changed since DRM's introduction --- anyone? Of course, it's an
> unacceptable compromise for people who want to use the lossless copying
> possibilities of digital music for personal reasons or who really care
> about the sound quality, but I sense that doesn't enter into this
> definition of "effective".

The typical definition of "effective" is usually that a normal person
(ie, someone unskilled in the arts of the digital age) can't make a
copy.

Regardless of whether  they have a right to that copy or not.

Rui

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBA2WZho+C50no0+t4RAtgrAJ4oh/QSbdVBYNRd/tkxlGXzNs2E7wCeJ51Y
1kSFgdQiBauLFwPB2X5GT3Q=
=3lvG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----