Re: Corrupt CD updates, Jun-2004

On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 12:03 +0100, Andy Buckley wrote:
> The "effective" bit is probably best judged by looking at how prevalent
> songs from "protected" CDs are on file sharing networks --- that's
> surely what the record companies will be looking for. I have no idea how
> this has changed since DRM's introduction --- anyone? Of course, it's an
> unacceptable compromise for people who want to use the lossless copying
> possibilities of digital music for personal reasons or who really care
> about the sound quality, but I sense that doesn't enter into this
> definition of "effective".

I would like to add that copy is just one part of the problem.

Access to the work is another entirely, and I've already been forbidden
to hear the latest Radio Head album :)

Rui

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBA2WbJo+C50no0+t4RAj6FAJ4iGsJogbwtKSPoLM0aQtYhqexZPQCgnt++
yvsslI1Z9Vc5nvTfb/NUbwQ=
=bcAk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----