Re: BPI to sue filesharers

"Chris James" <[email protected]> Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:26:16 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr
Message-ID <opsfjzl2cv9lhh68@lawxp-cpj>
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 07:19:37 -0700, miriam clinton (iriXx)  
<iriXx-i/[email protected]> wrote:

> forwarded from the Pho list.... as your Californian reporter this is  
> probably old news....
>
> mC~
>
>  From the British Phonographic Industry... I hope someone fights this,  
> so we can see the legality of all this in a British context. I do like  
> the reference to the laughable 'Mycokemusic' service.

If part of our argument is that DRM shouldn't be necessary because the law  
is sufficient and creators should trust 'consumers' to stay within the  
law, why would we want to fight this? (genuine question, not making a  
point :)