Re: Re: Bad-CD update Jan-2005

Jim Peters <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:16:57 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Glyn Kennington wrote:
> > Is it possible that during manufacture, a disc has its hole
> > accidentally placed off-centre?
> > [...] 
> > If so, maybe it was simply a poorly manufactured disc.  Otherwise, the
> > originally reported off-centre hole couldn't have been accidental, and
> > must be an intentional modification.
> 
> I took the original back to HMV, and they were happy to exchange it,
> though they said they hadn't had any other complaints.  The replacement
> still has the hole off-centre, though less noticeably so.  I haven't
> (yet) had any problems with it.
> 
> It may well be just a poorly manufactured disc, or even batch of discs.
> It's not beyond belief that factory checking standards could be less
> stringent for novelty Xmas singles than for albums.

Thanks for the update.  I've moved the report into the False Alarms
section for now, with a suggestion that Sony might like to sue the
manufacturer for patent infringement:

  http://ukcdr.org/issues/cd/bad/#EbUkO2KZ

Note that Sony's patent diagram shows a disc with an offset hole, and
'heavy' paint on the whole of one half of the disc, and with the disc
thickness changing from around 1.5mm to 1mm from one side of the disc
to the other.  Rather extreme ...

Jim

-- 
 Jim Peters                  (_)/=\~/_(_)                 [email protected]
                          (_)  /=\  ~/_  (_)
 UazĂș                  (_)    /=\    ~/_    (_)                http://
 Brighton, UK       (_) ____ /=\ ____ ~/_ ____ (_)            uazu.net