[ACPI-sppt] more info re. 2.4.21 patch problem [[email protected]: Re: 2.4.21 patch]
Emma Jane Hogbin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.acpi.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
----- Forwarded message from Christoph Terhechte <[email protected]> ----- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:08:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Terhechte <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 2.4.21 patch To: Emma Jane Hogbin <[email protected]> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > Just out of curiosity, did you follow all of the instructions that I > wrote? The instructions actually tell you that after you do a "make > oldconfig" you should go into "make menuconfig" and check that all of the > options are at least M if not Y. I am not going to make changes to what I > wrote if you didn't follow the instructions. You also said the first time > that you thought it was a problem with make-kpkg...is this still the case? Yes, that's how I found out about the source of the problem. After "make oldconfig", I went into "make menuconfig", and not only were the ACPI settings gone, they were not available in the menu either until I activated uniprocessor APIC. The problem with make-kpgk is basically the same, as make-kpkg ALWAYS overwrites a previous .config file. When you generate your file with menuconfig, it says "generated by make menuconfig". Run make-kpkg, and the .config changes slightly, saying it was "generated by make config". > > Therefore, if you did not have CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC=y in your old .config > > file, "make oldconfig" will throw out your ACPI settings. You need to > > activate APIC support first in order to configure ACPI. > > This is not a true statement. I do not have CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC set at all > and my ACPI settings were not thrown out. That's what I said: It was not true until now. For kernel 2.4.20 you did not need CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC=y to configure ACPI, and neither did you need it for kernel 2.4.21 with the May 22nd ACPI patch. However, you do need CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC=y if you applied the June 19th ACPI patch. I don't know why that is, but it is certainly true in my experience. > This option isn't really to do with ACPI, even though the acronyms > are close. I am not foolish enough to fall for the acronym similarity. But if you "grep -i" the ACPI patch file for "apic", you will get LOTS of references to APIC. Have you tried to configure kernel 2.4.21 with the latest ACPI patch yourself? I am pretty sure you will get the same results depending on the APIC setting. Best regards, Christoph -- Christoph Terhechte International Forum of New Cinema Potsdamer Strasse 2 D-10785 Berlin Tel: +49-30-26955-200 Fax: +49-30-26955-222 ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Emma Jane Hogbin [[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php