[Summary]Linux Performance Tuning

Jawal Sawa <[email protected]> Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:46:44 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.linux.admin.managers
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Managers,
Well what can i say i had only one response, which is attached below,
other  than that i have found Red Hat Linux Documentation fine, but
enough there are chapters on optimizing  the performance, and one
thing i also find usefull are notes from a lug presentation at

http://www.kalamazoolinux.org/presentations/19991221/

Sorry, i had not much input to summarise, thanks to Adam for his input

Walid.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: rsklnkv <rsklnkv-r3WryP/[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:45:22 -0500
Subject: Re: Linux Performance Tuning
To: Jawal Sawa <[email protected]>

Greetings.

Off the top of my head, I had good luck (specifically relating to IO) with
the book System Performance Tuning 2nd Edition by Musumeci.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/059600284X/qid=1096414853/sr=8-
1/ref=pd_csp_1/002-8757131-8984004?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

Sorry I don't have more. Good luck!

Regards.
Adam

-----
houseofthedead.org
_____
"The man who can face vilification and disgrace, who can stand up
against the popular current, even against his friends and his country
when he knows he is right, who can defy those in authority over him,
who can take punishment and prison and remain steadfastbthat is a man
of courage. The fellow whom you taunt as a 'slacker' because he refuses
to turn murdererbhe needs courage. But do you need much courage just to
obey orders, to do as you are told and to fa



---------- Original Message -----------
From: Jawal Sawa <[email protected]>
To: linuxmanagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected]
Sent: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:50:21 +0300
Subject: Linux Performance Tuning

> Dear Managers,
> I am looking into enhancing some o the linux machines, i have already
> run sar on them to collect some data, and was wondering what
> information is out there to make the systems perform better they are
> data crunchers, that use large sets of data, so /proc/sys/kernel/shm*
> are one of my targets, but looking around for the best setting for
> this i have found the following on an old perf. tuning tool vtad  "By
> looking at /proc/sys/kernel/shmmax and comparing it to the first
> entry in /proc/meminfo/Mem (physical memory), we can see the shared memory
>        limit as a percentage of physical memory. VTad recommends
> allowing at least 10% of physical memory to be shared, and prefers
> 25%. This helps Apache to cache files, if that feature is enabled"
> well one admin told me its always  better to set it up to the same as
> physical memory as it will not hurt, and i tend to agree with him, so
> my question are the following :
> 1- how many people use VTad?
> 2- I have found another tool similar to VTad,  called sarcheck, are
> there any other tools beside the three mention here in my mail to
> suggest performance tuning parameters?
>
> the Linux boxes i am talking about do heavy data crunching, and
> network I/O, are there any  good books about the subject ?
>
> I will summarize given time, and responses of course :)
>
> TIA
> good day,
>
> Jawal
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org
> submissions: LinuxManagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected]
> subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers
------- End of Original Message -------
_______________________________________________
LinuxManagers mailing list - http://www.linuxmanagers.org
submissions: LinuxManagers-35TzE1X9F6582KRnZfj+bdi2O/[email protected]
subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.linuxmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxmanagers