Re: Krita
Luke <[email protected]> Mon, 16 May 2005 21:06:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.arklinux.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > Hi, > I've just taken a look at the new KOffice beta -- and I've been rather > impressed with its latest addition, Krita (image manipulation program). > > This might be the GIMP killer we've been waiting for; actually I'm > wondering if we should dare replacing gimp with krita in the next release > (keeping gimp around on the Extra Software CD (where Krita currently is) > of course). > > Advantages: > - Its UI requires much less getting used to (the look and feel is much > more > "standard") > - Layers can be moved by inputting coordinates, reducing the need for > mouse acrobatics to align objects > - Can paint using filters (see e.g. the demo video at > http://home.no.net/~oyvinsat/var/krita2.mpeg) > - Can import gimp pens, brushes etc., so we're backwards compatible > - It's a KDE application, therefore > - it integrates better with the rest of the system > - we can move a slew of deprecated libraries off the main CD, making > room > for more important things > - we can modify it to suit our needs much better > - it's will progress faster than gimp because ppl can actually work on > features instead of working around the bad API of their toolkit of > choice > > Disadvantages: > - gimp is pretty much the standard ATM, so people who have used Linux > before > are likely to miss it > - gimp's filters are currently better (but Krita is catching up) > - Some things (e.g. moving an object on a huge pixmap) appear to be slower > > Now I'm not exactly a graphics person (actually I suck at graphics almost > as much as M$ sucks at making operating systems, many people can't even > recognize the abstract art that happens to be my handwriting), so I'd like > to hear the opinions of people who actually use graphics apps... > > LLaP > bero It looks ok, It appeares to be organized better then gimp, If you want to go for it go for it.