Re: Krita
David Tio <[email protected]> Tue, 17 May 2005 23:26:51 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.arklinux.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ark Linux |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi bero, I have tried it and all my students that used Ark Linux tried it. It looks nice, but just like other koffice application can't compete with openoffice, I don't think krita can compete with gimp yet. As much as I hate to use gimp, I would have to vote for a no. Warmest Regards, David Tio On 17 May 2005 am 10:06, Luke wrote: > Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just taken a look at the new KOffice beta -- and I've been rather > > impressed with its latest addition, Krita (image manipulation program). > > > > This might be the GIMP killer we've been waiting for; actually I'm > > wondering if we should dare replacing gimp with krita in the next release > > (keeping gimp around on the Extra Software CD (where Krita currently is) > > of course). > > > > Advantages: > > - Its UI requires much less getting used to (the look and feel is much > > more > > "standard") > > - Layers can be moved by inputting coordinates, reducing the need for > > mouse acrobatics to align objects > > - Can paint using filters (see e.g. the demo video at > > http://home.no.net/~oyvinsat/var/krita2.mpeg) > > - Can import gimp pens, brushes etc., so we're backwards compatible > > - It's a KDE application, therefore > > - it integrates better with the rest of the system > > - we can move a slew of deprecated libraries off the main CD, making > > room > > for more important things > > - we can modify it to suit our needs much better > > - it's will progress faster than gimp because ppl can actually work on > > features instead of working around the bad API of their toolkit of > > choice > > > > Disadvantages: > > - gimp is pretty much the standard ATM, so people who have used Linux > > before > > are likely to miss it > > - gimp's filters are currently better (but Krita is catching up) > > - Some things (e.g. moving an object on a huge pixmap) appear to be > > slower > > > > Now I'm not exactly a graphics person (actually I suck at graphics almost > > as much as M$ sucks at making operating systems, many people can't even > > recognize the abstract art that happens to be my handwriting), so I'd > > like to hear the opinions of people who actually use graphics apps... > > > > LLaP > > bero > > It looks ok, It appeares to be organized better then gimp, If you want to > go for it go for it.