Re: Ark Linux packaging rules
Joan Sanfeliu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.arklinux.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Thursday 22 January 2004 23:52, Pupeno wrote: > On Thursday 22 January 2004 13:01, Joan Sanfeliu wrote: > > It's me who was working on an RPM-HOWTO, i finally have corrected some > > issues and i'm attaching it here for you guys to review it, maybe we > > could join both documents into one? > > No, I don't think so, becuase they have very specific diferent targets. > Your document is for people to learn how to make RPMs, everybody who > doesn't know how to make RPM should read your document (even when not > making RPMs for Ark) while my document is a set of rules for which every > Ark RPM should apply, they're complementary documents, but diferent (your > document should be explanatory, mine should be strict). > Now, what we should do is to be sure there aren't inconsistencies between > documents and we should share the styles to make both of them look the > same. We should even interlink between them, like, in your document, it is > adviced to make the description blah blah and mandatory to be an Ark Linux > packaged like explaned in the Ark Linux Packaging Rules chapter 3.1, and I > could add "For more information consult the Ark Linux Packaging How To", > etc and both documents should be in the Ark Linux Development > Documentation. The idea of interlink both documents and make references to each other sounds good, i'll check my doc to adapt it to this. > > What do you think Pupeno? > > I have just taken a fast look to it and it seems nice... > One thing, when formating the document, try to use styles, Like "Standard" > "Document Title", "Heading 1", "Heading 2" like I did in my document > (latter we should use the same fonts (that is, the same style) and the > documents will look similar. Sure, makes sense to have both documents consistent, i'll resend a new version ASAP. regards, joan.