Re: Tuesdays Evenings's meeting

As Zackary pointed out ... reg camel books..

Books that i have and would recommend to others ...


Learning Perl - by Randal L.Schwartz and Tom Christiansen... Foreword by Larry 
Wall

Programming Perl - by Larry Wall , Tom Christiansen  and Randal Schwartz

Advanced Perl Programming - by Sriram Srinivasan 

Perl for System Adminstration - by David N.Blank-Edelman

mod_perl	- Pocket Reference - by Andrew Ford .. (can be handy when you are to 
lazy to browse online)

	All five from O'Reilly 

I must say (my own experience) .. that the Reilly books tend to be the best.

Furthermore i would suggest reading online.. 

	http://www.cpan.org  - Perl and Perl Modules documentation (yes you ca  
download it aswell) 

	and of course 

	http://www.perl.org   - Main perlsite
		

	
			Greetz Mike	
	



>Sorry it's taken forever to reply to this.  Apparently netscape thinks 
>that you and JScott are spammers :D  Rescued this from the junk mail pile.

>As always, the camel book from O'Reilly & Assoc.  is a great reference.  
>The perl man pages are also very good.  You should be able to use those 
>to 'interpret' somebody's existing perl code and understand it.. then 
>I'd try writing a few sample scripts using an existing script as a 
>template.  If you're already familiar with other programming languages 
>and/or script languages, it should go fairly quickly.

>robert wrote:

>Just a note on the front end. I will elaborate more on sunday.
>
>The layout in my opinion should be produced using CSS rather than tables. 
This 
>allows adaptation for different users to be more easily controlled. It also 
>simplifies coding of the site. It also means that if we do choose to change 
the 
>layout of the pages or colours for the pages that the information will all be 
>compatible and will not need porting.
>
>Backend Programming : Perl
>
>Can anyone recommend some tutorials, books etc to learn Perl. If the site is 
going 
>to be done in perl then it looks like I will have to learn it...
>
>Thanks
>
>
>Amoeba (Robert Smith)
>
>---- Original Message ----
From:          Zackary Deems
>Date:          Wed 9/10/03 13:23
>To:            www-devel-list
>Subject:       Tuesday Evening's meeting
>
>Our supplemental meeting was short but productive.  We still tried to 
>stay away from backend specifics for this discussion, and were able to 
>establish a consensus opinion on prospective site layout.
>
>Generally, we will be modifying the existing site layout, keeping 
>some/most/all of the current graphics and adapting them (where possible) 
>to the new layout.
>
>The new layout concept will follow these guidelines:
>   - The layout must be clean and uncluttered (amended: uncluttered on 
>screens 800x600+)
>   - The layout will remain simple, yet highly functional and user-friendly
>   - The layout will be comprised of a horizontal navbar at the top of 
>the screen, containing buttons
>      for navigating to general areas of the site (similar in function 
>to the current site) ; a vertical
>      navbar on the left of the screen comprised of links to both the 
>general areas, AND specific
>      sub-areas within those general areas.  Specific content will be 
>displayed in the main portion of
>      the window.
>    - The existing color scheme will be maintained for the new site.
>    - search and language widgets may be placed on the Ark Linux titlebar
>
>Specific content discussions will begin once we have a concrete site 
>framework.
>
>Topics for discussion for the upcoming meeting on Sunday:
>- any outstanding issues to date
>- begin discussion of proposed/desired content (will be an ongoing topic)
>- begin discussion of proposed 
>login/authentication/directory/permissions methods
>- begin discussion of proposed backend needs/issues/functions and 
>developer resources to
>   accomplish each.
>
>MY goal is to have the majority of our main issues squared away by the 
>end of the September 21 meeting, and to start delegating tasks asap 
>afterwards.  That may seem soon, but we cannot afford to treat this as 
>an unimportant side-issue.  Our website is our "Public Face to the 
>World" and while our current site serves its original purpose, we really 
>need to move toward a more professional and informative site.
>
>If we work together, this will not be a problem :)
>
>Once again, if you know you can't make it to a meeting, please just 
>shoot a note to this list, to myself, to saint, or mention it to one of 
>us in IRC.  If you have ideas you want put forward in the meeting, you 
>would be best served by sending your ideas to me WITH your note that you 
>can't attend, and I will make sure that your voice is heard.  We want to 
>give everyone an opportunity to contribute, but if you can't see your 
>way to letting us know not to expect you, then we have a hard time 
>seeing our way to bend over backward to hear your opinions.
>
>Thanks again to those of you who have given of your time to be with us.  
>We DO sincerely appreciate it.
>
>Have a great week!
>
>Z
>
>
>
>
>  
>