Re: First commercial deployment of aurora?

"Piotr Pietruszka" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.aurora.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Congratulations !

A5000 is scsi device not fiber I suppose :-(.
Its will be great device if its fiber (price ;-)).

Regards
PS. Sorry, but I dont know english well. ( Poland )

>>> [email protected] 21-08-2003 19:35:25 >>>
There are a couple people lurking around here that have done an e5k, 
myself included.  I didn't try real hard and had some problems, but 
others have gotten it to work better than I.

I would question what he's using to interface with that disk array, I 
can't remember if the a5000 is fiber or not, but it could be tricky if

it is.

oops, I see this is devel.  There are a couple people in users that
have 
run it on a e5k.

Matthew Swabey wrote:

> I was just sent this:
>
> -----------------------
>
> Hello Matthew
>
> I just spotted your name and email on the Aurora FAQ document and
just
> wanted to ask you a couple of questions.
>
> I own and run <snip> and I am in the process of building out
> the server infrastructure. I'm actually proposing to set up an 8 *
> 400MHz processor E4500 (5GB RAM) running Aurora Linux. It will also
have
> an A5000 fully loaded disk array. It will be the main MySQL database
and
> message application server for my company, with separate web servers
for
> HTTP traffic.
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1) Do you know of any problems with E4500 or A5000 machines and
Aurora?
> 2) I have access to an expert on Linux on Sparc called <snip>. He
> will be setting up the machine but do you know of anyone else based
here
> in the UK can help support a machine like this with Aurora on a
> commercial basis. Relying on a single supplier make me a little
nervous
>
>
> Many thanks for your time and I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> Regards
> <snip>
> -------------------
> Before I reply, I would like to check on something.
> As far as I know this is bigger iron than aurora has been run on, and

> also I don't think the A5000 is supported.
>
> Also how current is auroras security errata?
>
> Also I am curious, I didn't realise there were UK linux sparc 
> specialists :) my we are popular.
>
> Much power to us, this is certainly a serious commercial deployment,

> and a validation of a lot of hard work by many dedicated people. (You

> know who you are).
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel 
> Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html 


-- 
Paul Gienger                     Office:		701-281-1884
Applied Engineering Inc.         Cell:			701-799-0952
Information Systems Consultant   Fax:			701-281-1322
URL: www.ae-solutions.com        mailto:[email protected] 



_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected] 
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel 
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.