Re: FC2 SPARC status.
Magnus Hedemark <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Lamar Owen wrote: > I'll repeat my offer of before. I have almost 30 Sun Ultra 30's, all with > 248MHz processors and 128MB of RAM and a 4.2G HD each. If someone can set up > the distcc stuff for Aurora 1.0 (+updates), I'll put all of them up on a > private VLAN off our LAN, give spot and a few others ssh access, and you > would be free to use them as a buildfarm. If spot wants to use this build farm, I volunteer to set up distcc (and raise you ccache). > Do we really need to be held back for sparc32? Can the sparc64 users get > something we can use without being held back? +1 > I'd like to have just a Fedora > Core _1_ available, and that's with the 2.4 kernel. No use in going backwards with the few kind developer resources we have. Better, methinks, to try to keep up with x86 as best we can. _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html