Re: rh9 sparc

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 00:13, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:

> RHL 9 is two months away from end-of-life, and a lot of the fixes
> required to make various packages build properly in sparc have already
> been committed in the Fedora upstream packages. I've been uploading
> binary RPMs into the Corora directory on ftp.auroralinux.org, and I'll
> do another major sync at some point this week (which should be all of
> the core packages needed to create a vanilla buildroot). I strongly
> recommend that you start poking that tree and building packages out of
> rawhide instead.
> 
> But that's just where I'm taking Aurora. If you disagree, feel free to
> make RHL 9 for sparc. :)


So, if I wanted to build those packages from SRPMS, where would I get
the packages from?  Or, are the binaries that are available from corona
reliable?

_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAIPh/PnDMJB7BohIRAh0VAJ9zgzeBukXeKJP3fQscKrKb5Zis2wCgsSDj
VyMHubrFbeDsbsoU6pWi0vI=
=XG4g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----