Re: Aurora 1.0 and v100
"Tom 'spot' Callaway" <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:25:34 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 18:12 +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > I want to upgrade to Cocona 2.6.11 kernel but without fixing neon it will > be very hard (so I'll wait for fix this package first :) I don't really understand the problem here... > BTW: dmfe module was automatically choosed by kudzu so if this dmfe is > realy broken/obsoleted (and must be used tulip) kudzu must be also fixed. Yeah, some of the Netra's are pretty broken on Linux. If you've got time, could you note this in the hardware database entry for the v100? ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html