Re: Aurora 1.0 and v100
Tomasz Kłoczko <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:34:54 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 18:12 +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > >> I want to upgrade to Cocona 2.6.11 kernel but without fixing neon it will >> be very hard (so I'll wait for fix this package first :) > > I don't really understand the problem here... rpm after upgrade set of packages is unusable. This stops all other changes (using rpm). >> BTW: dmfe module was automatically choosed by kudzu so if this dmfe is >> realy broken/obsoleted (and must be used tulip) kudzu must be also fixed. > > Yeah, some of the Netra's are pretty broken on Linux. If you've got > time, could you note this in the hardware database entry for the v100? Where ? in what kind of form ? kloczek -- ----------------------------------------------------------- *Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają* ----------------------------------------------------------- Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: [email protected]* _______________________________________________ Aurora-sparc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-devel Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html