Re: passing kernel options during network install?

Chris Ricker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.aurora.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:

> > hda: lost interrupt
> 
> Yeah. This is a bug. It really depends on which way the wind is blowing as 
> to whether the Aurora 1.0 kernel will work on the SB100 or not. The IDE 
> controller only has worked reliably in Linux very recently, 2.4.21-pre5 
> and higher.
> 
> Passing ide=nodma via: 
> boot net linux ide=nodma
> 
> may help things, but it may not.

Thanks, that seems to fix it (I'm currently 1800 megs into an install which
never got more than 100 megs w/o it).

It might be worth adding that to the FAQ as the proper syntax when doing
network installs, since I was trying various other incantations which didn't
work ;-)

This particular 'blade was previously running Debian. There, I needed the 
nodma as well, but just passed it at the SILO prompt....

> I don't have this as a "must-fix" until the next release of Aurora, but if
> public opinion is fervent enough, I can always spin a 1.1 with a newer
> kernel.

Sounds good. I can always upgrade manually after the install finishes. With 
the 2.4.21-pre5+ kernels, should I still need to disable DMA for the IDE 
controller?

later,
chris
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.