Re: passing kernel options during network install?
Chris Ricker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > hda: lost interrupt > > Yeah. This is a bug. It really depends on which way the wind is blowing as > to whether the Aurora 1.0 kernel will work on the SB100 or not. The IDE > controller only has worked reliably in Linux very recently, 2.4.21-pre5 > and higher. > > Passing ide=nodma via: > boot net linux ide=nodma > > may help things, but it may not. Thanks, that seems to fix it (I'm currently 1800 megs into an install which never got more than 100 megs w/o it). It might be worth adding that to the FAQ as the proper syntax when doing network installs, since I was trying various other incantations which didn't work ;-) This particular 'blade was previously running Debian. There, I needed the nodma as well, but just passed it at the SILO prompt.... > I don't have this as a "must-fix" until the next release of Aurora, but if > public opinion is fervent enough, I can always spin a 1.1 with a newer > kernel. Sounds good. I can always upgrade manually after the install finishes. With the 2.4.21-pre5+ kernels, should I still need to disable DMA for the IDE controller? later, chris