Re: Installed 2.0 to SS4 ...
Jima <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.aurora.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, mat wrote:
> I can't speak for the SS5s, but my ultra1 is doing fine under aurora:
>
> [root@aurora ~]# uptime
> 00:00:40 up 374 days, 19:15, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.03, 0.00
I have four U1's running 2.0/~2.1 (beta), although none with that kind of
uptime. (My U10 running 1.0 made over 500 days, though.)
> I do have a sparc classic LX that I'd like to get around to trying
> aurora 2.0 on though...
> I'll let you know how I get on. Slowly, I would imagine.
I tried it on one with 48mb of RAM; suffice it to say it didn't go so
well. Hopefully I'll get the one with 96mb back soon so I can try it out.
Jima
_______________________________________________
Aurora-sparc-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.auroralinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aurora-sparc-user
Aurora FAQ: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~mas01r/aurorafaq.html